I'm not just a donkey - I'm a terrorist one
Showing posts with label ناجي صوراتي، LAU، Nagy Souraty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ناجي صوراتي، LAU، Nagy Souraty. Show all posts

Monday, 28 February 2011

Theatre of the Edge: The edge of theatre.




A man who has not been seen in a long time, a man who has recently been the subject of many debates, fights, and some occasional jokes, made his presence onstage on Wednesday, February 23rd, 2010 in a talk/installation about violence and egocentrism.
After a lot of mindless babble, accusations, and self-motivation, this figure of mystery, recently known as didaskalos, posited his initiation of a new form of theatre, his theatre, the Theatre of the Edge. To him, he is a god - and likewise to many of his followers - and he believes his theatre to be a kind of therapy and personality building. He brings people to an epoch of character and maturity, he not only teaches them how to jump and act, but also teaches them about life, and how to become ‘better human beings’ in life. Something I find really fascinating, how people can owe their existence and being to one man! It should be prudent now to explain the reason why this man decided to have this talk.
This man, didaskalos, has been very recently kicked out of an academic institution for punishing one of his actors by burning him with a cigar lighter. Three burns, on the bicep, waist, and thigh - because, of course, three is the charm!
A lot of controversy has followed this act;
Did it really happen?
Was it blown out of proportion?
Is burning wrong?
Is torture wrong?
How can one judge if one did not actually witness this act?
Is it fair for someone to be scandalized just because of one little act?
So many questions, it’s crazy! The puzzling thing about all this is that people now-a-days can’t seem to clearly see wrong from right. Some people seem to think that thinking is not necessary anymore. Some people seem to have nothing to believe in anymore. But enough of contemplations and ambiguity, we come here to talk about theatre and its edge.
A grand concept! A dazzling way of presenting this concept: a scrim, a lighter, a saj, and a very charismatic man onstage. As usual, his charisma filled the theatre he was in. This man talked and talked, every now and then quoting Antonin Artaud, a grand theatre person in history, a man didaskalos admires a lot, I remember from how he used to talk of Artaud in his classes.
Our man, didaskalos, quoted Artaud saying that people must revolt against rules and institutions that are only there to close our minds and bottle up our thoughts. Our man calls for revolting against rules! He did this by reading a lengthy letter written by Artaud to the chancellors of the universities of Europe. Every now and then he would stop and say: “This is Artuad not me” followed by a laughtrack from the audience that starts and stops at the same time. It’s genius when one critiques his own techniques indirectly by putting them in different circumstances, it makes stupid people think he’s wise, but makes smart people see that he’s a hypocrite!
Talking onstage was one of the rules of the Souratian theatre that led to all this fuss! And breaking a Souratian rule has many consequences.
These two men, didaskalos and Artaud, share many things, (or so he would wish): they are both madmen and genuine theatre people, however Artaud was aware of his madness and lived in an asylum for most of his life. Also Artaud never knew he was such a genius and never claimed to have created his own form of theatre; he followed the movement of surrealism, one that many of the world’s greatest artists followed, a movement that no man created, but rather a collection of artists and thinkers. Our man, however, has the nerve to say that he has created his own form of theatre, which he names Souratism: theatre of the Edge.
A theatre that drives people to the edge.
Tests their endurance!
Makes them strong!
Hurts them.
Makes them weak so they become strong.
Kills them.
Makes them fly!
It’s apparent to see how we have reached a real edge.
The edge of a cliff.
The edge of sanity.
It’s funny how people can be dazzled by a man who stands onstage holding a whip saying: “I have a whip!” The lights went down, music faded up, projections from his last play were shown, and he stood there striking it down repeatedly. Even by just listening to the recording of the lecture and to the whip striking the floor again and again, I felt scared. Something was going wrong. Something lurid was stirring in this man’s head. But for the people who saw him playing with the whip that day, one thought crossed their minds as they looked at him in awe: “the man has lost it!”
It’s very funny when people are blinded by one man who puts truth on the edge and lies and lies and lies and lies… until a lie becomes the truth! But then again, didaskalos is a master of rhetoric, the art of using words. He does it so well. He did it so well that day. He boosted up the British accent, used the right words, and let the magic fly! The word is a very dangerous tool. The spoken word. And he uses it so well! Rhetoric was an art that people used to study back in the days of the Greeks and the Romans, even after that. It was the best way for propaganda. Many teachers, generals, dictators, politicians, and leaders used it.
“The boy jumped on the fire!”
Two months ago the whole story didn’t even happen.
One month ago it was part of experimentation.
Three weeks ago it was punishment.
That day, didaskalos bluntly lied and said that the boy himself asked for it and jumped on the lit lighter that happened to be in the director’s hands! Didaskalos didn’t mean to burn him he was merely scaring the boy, but the boy unexpectedly jumped on it! Three times! And didaskalos couldn’t seem to realize that he must turn off the lighter!
But many people have lied in history. Many people have created concepts based on lies. Many people have achieved so much based on lies. Many people have gotten away with kingdoms and empires based on lies. Many people have created cults based on lies. And one man in history led a whole people and country based on one big lie.
I think it is time to stop quoting Artaud and start quoting a man who much more resembles didaskalos, Adolf Hitler.
“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it”
As I’m writing this I remembered one time in one of Nagy Souraty’s classes when I proposed I work on the character of Adolf Hitler for my acting final and he rejected saying it was not interesting enough. It’s scary to delve into the psychology of a dictator, a person with so much power and control. But I find it very interesting. It is really interesting to see how people can conquer minds with their wit, looks, and charisma.
Mind control.
“National Socialism is not a cult-movement—a movement for worship; it is exclusively a 'volkic' political doctrine based upon racial principles. In its purpose there is no mystic cult, only the care and leadership of a people defined by a common blood-relationship... We will not allow mystically-minded occult folk with a passion for exploring the secrets of the world beyond to steal into our Movement. Such folk are not National Socialists, but something else—in any case something which has nothing to do with us. At the head of our programme there stand no secret surmisings but clear-cut perception and straightforward profession of belief. But since we set as the central point of this perception and of this profession of belief the maintenance and hence the security for the future of a being formed by God, we thus serve the maintenance of a divine work and fulfill a divine will”
- Adolf Hitler: Nuremberg, September 6, 1938
He said: “I kept wondering, why do they hate us so much? It is then I realized that it’s because they don’t understand us.” Us and them. Right and wrong. He laughed and said: “and they say we’re a cult! They really believe it”, but then again none of his supporters (the really radical ones) ever disagree with him, they all adore him, he is able to get two people onstage and remove their shirts and hit each other, he was able to have a TV setup in the Fine Arts lobby with his interview on it repeated over and over, they all sit around the TV watching him with awe and ecstasy, he is able to say in his rehearsals: “whatever I say is godly”, they believe it, they all think like him, some of them walk like him, sit in his chair the way he sits in Gulbenkian, he is able to burn one of is actors, once, twice, three times without them opening their mouths.
Does anyone sense the commonalities?
Mind control.
The little theatre in Masrah Al Madina was full of it that day. It was a pity I couldn’t make it, I really wanted to. I wanted to see the man with the whip!
Nevertheless, I felt really proud, proud of how my friends – a small group of really clever and interesting people – raised very smart questions to didaskalos.
I was very proud of how he cut them off as they spoke and changed the subject.
I was very proud of how they felt that this once mysterious and scary university professor was not scary at all anymore.
I was very proud of how some people removed their sight from them when they were glared at.
I was very proud of how for the first time I knew what it is to be a “dangerous citizen”.

Fuad Halwani
 


Monday, 10 January 2011

Nagy Souraty: Violence- Silence- Survival


Due to the high number of requests to translate the post published on the 1st of January 2011, The Terrorist donkey complies.
"Nagy Souraty, theatre director (an experimental one) and theatre instructor at the Lebanese American University (LAU) and College Protestant Francaise, says about his recent theatre production "Apospasmata Aghonistika" or "Dissonance of Fights", that: "The ideas explored in this work are that of violence, fights, killing, angels, warriors, time, memory, silence, noise, cyclicality, identity, survival, and humanity".


Amazing is the theatrical trip of discovery that this educated, philosopher-director takes us through! I did not get the chance to watch "Apospasmata Aghonistika", but I have watched last year's production "In the Hear of the Heart of Another Body" and I'd had enough of experimentation.

But slowly, guilt started eating me up and began cutting me to tiny tiny pieces, not because I missed out on an exuberant performance that has driven people to tears, it was because I didn't get the chance to see Rami acting, jumping, and dancing.



Who is Rami?
Rami is not a student at LAU.
Rami practices "Capoueira", a form of Brazilian combat/dance.
Rami acts in Nagy Souraty's play.


Rami is talkative, he talks endlessly.
Nagy doesn't like people who talk in his rehearsals.


During rehearsals, talking is not aloud.
If you talk while onstage, it is up to your fellow actor to hit you lightly on your mouth. 

Silence

Nagy Souraty put this rule with the consent of the team. Democracy.


Kalyl stands next to Rami in the rehearsals.
Kalyl is an active student in the university.
And he also acts with Nagy

Rami talks.
Kalyl lightly hits him on the mouth.
Rami doesn't shut up. He talks again.
Kalyl hits him again.
Kalyl abides by the rules. A disciplined student.
Whereas Rami is not.
Rami hits Kalyl. We don't know if it was a strong hit or a light one.

Violence

Nagy Souraty is angered by this level of violence
But for every illness there is a cure.


Souraty lines his actors up across the stage...
He stands Rami in front of them.

Souraty begins to tie Rami up.
Everyone watches.

What will the godly director do?
Is he going to rape Rami in front of his fellow actors - students in the peak of their youth?
What will the godly Souraty do?
 
Souraty asks his actors to come forth and hit Rami.
Some hit him violently, while others lightly.
The hitting ends.

Souraty asks his stage manager to go to his office.
Why to the office? Will she come with some milk to place on Rami's ears and leave him to the numerous cats in the university campus?
No.
She went to fetch a lighter.
The lighter is not for Souraty's Gauloise Reds, it is a cigar lighter.
And these lighters are different from normal cigarette lighters.
They burn more and better!

The stage manager arrives with the lighter, the lighter is now in the theatre and in Souraty's hand precisely.


Souraty begins burning Rami's body.

Once.
The sound of the lighter caressing human flesh.
Twice.
The smell of the burning flesh.
Thrice.


The actors and crew watch.
With fear, disgust, pleasure, its not important.
What is important is that they are watching - standing in silence.
The smell of burning flesh and this Souraty-creature's Nazism has tied their tongues.


The lighter dances on Rami's tied up body... who is hurting in silence.
Does he enjoy the pain or doesn't mind it?
At the same time Souraty gives a lecture. Yes he has the audacity to lecture! About what?
About violence... Yes, because Rami is violent. He learned it in life, and his remedy should be nothing but violence.
Another one of Souraty's rules has been applied in the university theatre under the laws of the university.
The production staff agree, what about the administration? Where is the administration?

The burning is over,


A After-burning meeting

All are there. Souraty asks his team if they agree with the psychological crime he has committed on them and with their involvement.
Souraty is democratic.
All agree save two actors.

He kicks them out.
And the rest remained.

Survival
The maddest part of this story is that Rami, despite being humiliated, struck, and burned, decided to stay and participate in the performance.
He danced with his burn-marks, which bled while he danced.
The maddest part of the story is that these students didn't realize to what extent they had been traumatized by what they experienced in Souraty's rehearsals.
They didn't react, they didn't demand his sacking, they didn't piss on him.

A person like Souraty, who suggests aesthetics and experimentation, brainwashes and lies.
The university is his realm.
And he abuses it.
He lives a fantasia that has no limits.
It begins with a lighter and burned skin.
But there is no limits to what he may do in years to come.

Will the punishment in the next play be a gas-chamber?
Or urination in the mouth?

Did the university administration ask this question?
Did the College Protestant ask this question?
I don't care about Souraty, he doesn't mean anything to me and I've never seen him in my life.
For he is free to practice his fetishes and experiments when he is in bed alone or with the company of others.
They will burn each other and have a good time.
They are in bed, the door is locked, and we need not know more.
However, practicing these things in a university or school is a grave sickness.
It's effects are evident in his victims' features, be they his students or worshipers.


The question remains...
Does Souraty give private lessons?
Please answer yes or no!
Keeping in mind that more of the "Souraty School" will be coming soon.
I will make this issue my own concern."

Saturday, 1 January 2011

ناجي صوراتي: العنف - الصمت - البقاء

يقول ناجي صوراتي، المخرج المسرحي(التجريبي منه فقط) وأستاذ المسرح في الجامعة اللبنانية الأميركية ومدرسة الكوليج
يقول عن مسرحيته الأخيرة "تقاسيم عراكية : الأفكار التي استكشفناها في هذا العمل هي العنف، والمعارك. والقتل، والملائكة، والمحاربون،والوقت والذاكرة والصمت والضجيج، والإستدارية، والهوية، والبقاء والإنسانية"  

رائعة هذه الرحلة المسرحية الإسكشافية التي يقوم بها هذا المخرج المثڤف والفيلسوف   
لم أشاهد "تقاسيم عراكية لأنني شاهدت عرضه السابق ((في قلب قلب جسد آخر)) واكتفيت من التجريب

لكن شيئا فشيئا بدأ الندم يأكلني ويقطعني شقف صغيرة لأنني لم أذهب لمشاهدة العرض
ليس  لأنني فوّت على نفسي عرضا خلابا أبكى العالم
بل لأنني كنت وددت مشاهدة رامي وهو يمثل وينط ويرقص.



من رامي؟
رامي ليس تلميذا في الجامعة اللبنانية الأميركية
رامي يجيد "الكابويرا" وهو فن قتالي برازيلي.
رامي يمثل مع ناجي صوراتي في مسرحياته 

رامي حكوجي. يتكلم باستمرار.
ناجي صوراتي لا يحب من يتكلم في التمارين 

في التمارين ممنوع الكلام، 
اذا تكلمت، على زميلك الممثل أن يضربك حالا وبخفّة على فمك 
  
الصمت

ناجي صوراتي وضع هذا القانون وفريق العمل وافق. ديمقراطيه

خليل يقف الى جانب رامي في التمرين 
خليل تلميذ  نشيط في الجامعة
وهو ممثل مع ناجي

 
رامي يتكلم
خليل يصفعه عل خفيف
رامي لا يسكت، يتكلم مرة أخرى
يصفعه خليل مرة أخرى

خليل يطبّق القانون. تلميذ منضبط، يسمع الكلمة. 
أما رامي لا
رامي يضرب خليل ،لا نعرف اذا كانت صفعة عل خفيف أو عل ثقيل

العنف

ناجي صوراتي يغضب من حالة العنف هذه
لكن لكل داء دواء

...يجمع ممثليه في صف مستقيم على خشبة المسرح
يقف رامي في الأمام

يبدأ الصوراتي بتربيط رامي
الكل يتفرج

 ماذا سيفعل المخرج الآلهة؟
هل سيغتصب رامي على مرأى زملائه الممثلين - طلاب في مقتبل العمر؟ 
  ماذا سيفعل الآلهة الصوراتي؟

يطلب الصوراتي من الممثلين الزملاء بالتقدم من رامي و ضربه
منهم من ضربه بخفة ومنهم من ضربه بقوة
ينتهي الضرب
   
يطلب  الصوراتي من تلميذة نشيطة الذهاب الى مكتبه
لماذا مكتبه؟ هل ستأتي باللبن لوضعه على اذني رامي ومن ثم تركه للقطط الكثيرة في حرم الجامعة؟
لا
ذهبت لتأتي بولاعة أي قداحة
القداحة ليست لسجائره  الغولواز الحمراء بل هي قداحة سيجار
وهي مختلفة عن القداحة العادية
تحرق أكثر

تأتي التلميذه النشيطة بالقداحة،   قداحة السيجار أصبحت في المنزل (أي المسرح) و في يد الصوراتي تحديدا



الصوراتي يبدأ بحرق جسم رامي

مرة
صوت القداحة تلامس الجلد
مرتين
رائحة جلد محروق
ثلاث 

الممثلون يتفرجون
برعب، باشمئزاز، بلذه، مش مهم
المهم أنهم يتفرجون- موافقون ب صمت
ربطت ألسنتهم رائحة الجلد المحروق ونازية هذا المخلوق الصوراتي

قداحةالصوراتي تراقص جسم رامي المربوط... يتألم ب صمت
ربما يحب الألم أو لا يمانعه؟   .
 الصوراتي في الوقت عينه يحاضر. نعم كان يحاضر بكل وقاحة! عن ماذا؟ 
عن العنف...نعم فرامي هو عنيف، تعلم العنف في الحياة، واصلاحه يكون فقط عبر العنف
قانون صوراتي آخر يطبق في مسرح جامعي تحت قانون الجامعة
فريق العمل موافق، ادارة الجامعة! أين إدارة الجامعة؟
 
ينتهي الحرق،

اجتماع ما بعد الحرق

الكل مجتمع! يسأل الصوراتي الممثلين من منهم يوافق على هذه الجريمة النفسية التي ارتكبها معهم وبمشاركتهم؟
الصوراتي ديمقراطي
الكل وافق ما عدا ممثلين اثنين

طردهما
وبقي الكل

البقاء
  
أكثر ما يغضب في القصة أن رامي وبالرغم من الإهانة والحرق والضرب،  قرّر البقاء والمشاركة في العرض
رقص وهو محروقا، كان حرقه ينزف وهو يرقص،
أكثر ما يغضب في القصة أن الطلاب لم يفهموا مدى الأذى الذي تعرضوا له في صف الصوراتي
ولم يكترثوا، لم يطالبوا بطرده، ولم يزّرقوا عليه

انسان كصوراتي، يدّعي الجمال والتجريب، يغسل دماغ ويكذب
الجامعة تيتج له
وهو يجود
يعيش فانتازيا لا أحد يعرف  حدودها
 بدايتها قداحة وحرق
لكننا نجهل وقاحتها ومداها

هل العقاب في المسرحية القادمة سيكون غرفة الغاز؟
أم التبويل في الفم؟

هل سألت ادارة الجامعة هذا السؤال؟
هل سألت مدرسة الكوليج هذا السؤال؟

الصوراتي لا يهمني ولا يعنيني ولم ألتقيه يوما في حياتي
فهو حر بممارسة قصصه واستكشفاته اذا كان نائما في سريره وحيدا أوبصحبة آخرين
يحرقون بعض ويتلذذون
هم في السرير والباب مقفل ولا أريد أن أعرف




انما ممارسة هذه القصص في الجامعة  أو في المدرسة هو مرض لئيم
عوارضه ظاهرة على ملامح ضحاياه تلاميذ كانوا أو مؤّلهين 

يبقى السؤال
هل يعطي الصوراتي دروسا خصوصية؟
يرجى الإجابة بنعم أو لا
علما أن المزيد عن "المدرسة الصوراتيه" سيأتيكم قريبا
سأجعل الصوراتي شغلتي و عملتي